Opened 5 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

#185 closed Defect (duplicate)

MQUASILAG in backward mode

Reported by: mdmulder Owned by:
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: FP other Version: FLEXPART 10.0
Keywords: Cc:

Description

Dear all,

Anyone interested in implementing the MQUASILAG in backward mode?

Preferably in FP v9.02, which I currently use. But if there is a reason to rather do it already in v10 its also fine, I can wait for it.

I read that some people think that the option in forward mode is not properly implemented. So I think this can be dealt with at the same time.

(Im not sure yet if there is some money for this from the project, but at least I can offer co-authorship.)

Thanks!

Change History (4)

comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by pesei

Hi M., it seems the v10 developers are not so interested ...

Why do you want this in bwd mode - if we use it with domain-filling runs, fwd or bwd will give the same information. Are there non-domain-filling applications?

And what is the knowledge about "not properly implemented"? Many years ago, using A. Stohl's 4-yr global data set, I noticed some minor issues in the resulting data which were probably produced with the first version of this. I could dig that out again ...

comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by pesei

And let's also keep in mind ticket:122 (maybe close this one as duplicate and have all in #122?)

Last edited 5 years ago by pesei (previous) (diff)

comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by mdmulder

Hi Petra,
thank you for replying. For the project, we found a way to solve it in the post-processing and we dont necessarily need the labelling now. With my former colleagues in Brno we use it for source-receptor studies.
With "not properly implemented" I probably meant #122, sorry for not citing it. I agree that my ticket duplicates yours, so I will soon remove it.
Thank you,
Mariëlle

comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by admin

  • Resolution set to duplicate
  • Status changed from new to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
hosted by ZAMG