source: flex_extract.git/Documentation/html/_sources/Documentation/disagg.rst.txt @ 47be0cb6

ctbtodev
Last change on this file since 47be0cb6 was 47be0cb6, checked in by Anne Philipp <anne.philipp@…>, 4 years ago

redo Sphinx documentation

  • Property mode set to 100644
File size: 10.6 KB
Line 
1***************************
2Disaggregation of Flux Data
3***************************
4   
5``FLEXPART`` interpolates meteorological input data linearly to the position of computational particles in time and space. This method requires point values in the discrete input fields. However, flux data (as listed in table :ref:`ref-table-fluxpar`) from the ECMWF represent cell averages or integrals and are accumulated over a specific time interval, depending on the dataset. Hence, to conserve the integral quantity with ``FLEXPART``'s linear interpolation a pre-processing scheme has to be applied.
6
7.. _ref-table-fluxpar:
8
9.. csv-table:: flux fields
10    :header: "Short Name", "Name", "Units", "Interpolation Type"
11    :align: center
12    :widths: 5,15,5,10
13   
14    LSP,  "large-scale precipitation",          ":math:`m`",          "modified linear interpolation"
15    CP,   "convective precipitation",           ":math:`m`",          "modified linear interpolation"
16    SSHF, "surface sensible heat flux",         ":math:`J m^{-2}`",   "bicubic interpolation"
17    EWSS, "eastward turbulent surface stress",  ":math:`N m^{-2} s`", "bicubic interpolation"
18    NSSS, "northward turbulent surface stress", ":math:`N m^{-2} s`", "bicubic interpolation"
19    SSR,  "surface net solar radiation",        ":math:`J m^{-2}`",   "bicubic interpolation"
20   
21
22The first step is to *de-accumulate* the fields in time so that each value represents an integral in x, y, t space.
23Afterwards, a *disaggregation* scheme is applied which means to break down the integral value into point values.
24In order to be able to carry out the disaggregation procedure proposed by Paul James, additional flux data is retrieved automatically for one day at the beginning and one day at the end of the period specified. Thus, data for flux computation will be requested for the period START_DATE-1 to END_DATE+1. Note that these (additional) dates are used only for interpolation within ``flex_extract`` and are not communicated to the final ``FLEXPART`` input files.
25
26The flux disaggregation produces files named ``fluxYYYYMMDDHH``, where ``YYYYMMDDHH`` is the date format. Note, that the first two and last two flux files do not contain any data.
27
28.. note::
29
30    Note also that for operational retrievals (``BASETIME`` set to 00 or 12) forecast fluxes are only available until ``BASETIME``, so that no polynomial interpolation is possible in the last two time intervals. This is the reason why setting ``BASETIME`` is not recommended for on demand scripts.       
31       
32
33Disaggregation for precipitation in older versions
34--------------------------------------------------
35
36In ``flex_extract`` up to version 5 the disaggregation was done with a Fortran program (FLXACC2). In version 6 this part was converted to Python.
37
38
39In the old versions (below 7.1) a relatively simple method processes the precipitation fields in a way that is consistent with the scheme applied in ``FLEXPART`` for all variables: linear interpolation between times where input fields are available.
40At first the accumulated values are divided by the number of hours (i.e., 3 or 6).
41The best option for disaggregation, which was realised, is conservation within the interval under consideration plus the two adjacent ones.
42Unfortunately, this leads to undesired temporal smoothing of the precipitation time series – maxima are damped and minima are raised.
43It is even possible to produce non-zero precipitation in dry intervals bordering a precipitation period as shown in Fig. 1.
44This is obviously undesirable as it will affect wet scavenging, a very efficient removal process for many atmospheric trace species.
45Wet deposition may be produced in grid cells where none should occur, or too little may be produced in others. This could lead to an unrealistic, checkerboard-like deposition fields.
46Horizontally, the precipitation values are averages for a grid cell around the grid point to which they are ascribed, and ``FLEXPART`` uses bilinear interpolation to obtain precipitation rates at particle positions.
47However, the supporting points in space are not shifted between precipitation and other variables as is the case for the temporal dimension.
48
49
50.. _ref-fig-olddisagg:
51
52.. figure:: ../_files/old_disagg.png
53    :figclass: align-center
54
55    Fig. 1: Example of disaggregation scheme as implemented in older versions for an isolated precipitation event lasting one time interval (thick blue line). The amount of original precipitation after de-accumulation is given by the blue-shaded area. The green circles represent the discrete grid points after disaggregation and linearly interpolate in between them as indicated by the green line and the green-shaded area. Note that supporting points for the interpolation are shifted by a half-time interval compared to the times when other meteorological fields are available (Hittmeir et al. 2018).
56
57
58
59Disaggregation is done for 4 adjacent timespans (:math:`a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3`) which generates a new, disaggregated value which is output at the central point of the 4 adjacent timespans.
60
61.. math::
62
63       p_{ac} &= 0.5 * a_1\\
64            m &= a_0 + a_2 > 0.\\
65    p_{ac}(m) &= a_1(m) * a_2(m) / (a_0(m) + a_2(m))\\
66       p_{bd} &= 0.5 * a_2\\
67            m &= a_1 + a_3 > 0.\\
68    p_{bd}(m) &= a_1(m) * a_2(m) / (a_1(m) + a_3(m))\\
69
70
71This new point :math:`p` is used for linear interpolation of the complete timeseries afterwards. If one of the 4 original timespans has a value below 0 it is set to 0 prior to the calculation.
72   
73.. math::
74
75    p = p_{ac} + p_{bd}
76
77
78
79
80
81
82Disaggregation for precipitation in version 7.1
83-----------------------------------------------
84
85Due to the problems with generating precipitation in originally dry (or lower) intervals and the temporal smoothing a new algorithm was developed. The approach is based on a one dimensional piecewise linear function with two additional supporting grid points within each grid cell, dividing the interval into three pieces. It fulfils the desired requirements by preserving the integral precipitation in each time interval, guaranteeing continuity at interval boundaries, and maintaining non-negativity. An additional monotonicity filter helps to gain monotonicity.
86The more natural requirements of symmetry, reality, computational efficiency and easy implementation motivates the linear formulation.
87These requirements on the reconstruction algorithm imply that time intervals with no precipitation remain unchanged, i.e. the reconstructed values vanish throughout this whole time interval, too.
88In the simplest scenario of an isolated precipitation event, where in the time interval before and after the data values are zero, the reconstruction algorithm therefore has to vanish at the boundaries of the interval, too.
89The additional conditions of continuity and conservation of the precipitation amount then require us to introduce sub-grid points if we want to keep a linear interpolation (Fig. 2).
90The height is thereby determined by the condition of conservation of the integral of the function over the time interval.
91 
92   
93.. _ref-fig-newdisagg:                       
94
95.. figure:: ../_files/new_disagg.png         
96    :figclass: align-center
97   
98    Fig. 2: Precipitation rate linearly interpolated using a sub-grid with two additional points. Colours as in Fig. 1 (Hittmeir et al. 2018).       
99   
100
101Figure 3 shows an overview of the new algorithm and its components.
102   
103.. _ref-fig-IA3:                       
104
105.. figure:: ../_files/IA3.png         
106    :figclass: align-center
107   
108    Fig. 3: Schematic overview of the basic notation in a precipitation interval with the original precipitation rate g (green) as a step function and the interpolated data :math:`f` (dark blue) as the piecewise linear function. The original time interval with fixed grid length :math:`\delta t` is split equidistantly in three subintervals denoted by :math:`I_i^{1,2,3}`, with the slopes in the subintervals as denoted by :math:`k_i^{1,2,3}` . The sub-grid function values :math:`f_i, f_i^{1,2}, f_{i+1}` are marked by red diamonds (Hittmeir et al. 2018).
109   
110
111The following lists the equations of the new algorithm.
112   
113.. math::
114
115    f_i^{(1)}=&\frac32 g_i -\frac{1}{12}f_{i}-\frac{5}{12}f_{i+1}
116   
117    f_i^{(2)}=&\frac32 g_i -\frac{5}{12}f_{i}-\frac{1}{12}f_{i+1}
118   
119    f_{i+1}=&\min\{3 g_i,3 g_{i+1},\sqrt{g_ig_{i+1}}\}
120   
121.. math::
122   
123    \textbf{if}  \quad
124    \mathrm{sgn}(k_{i}^{(2)})\cdot \mathrm{sgn}(k_{i  }^{(3)})&=-1 \quad \wedge \\
125    \mathrm{sgn}(k_{i  }^{(3)})\cdot \mathrm{sgn}(k_{i+1}^{(1)})&=-1 \quad \wedge \\
126    \mathrm{sgn}(k_{i+1}^{(1)})\cdot \mathrm{sgn}(k_{i+1}^{(2)})&=-1  \quad
127    \textbf{then}
128
129.. math::
130   
131    f_{i+1}^\diamond=&\frac{18}{13}g_i-\frac{5}{13}f_i
132   
133    f_{i+1}^{\diamond\diamond}=&\frac{18}{13}g_{i+1}-\frac{5}{13}f_{i+2}
134   
135    f_{i+1} =& \min\left\{3 g_i,\, 3 g_{i+1},\, \sqrt{(f_{i+1}^\diamond\,f_{i+1}^{\diamond\diamond})_+}\right\}   
136   
137    f_i^{(1)}=& \frac32 g_i -\frac{1}{12}f_{i}-\frac{5}{12}f_{i+1}^{\textrm{mon}}
138   
139    f_i^{(2)}=& \frac32 g_i -\frac{5}{12}f_{i}-\frac{1}{12}f_{i+1}^{\textrm{mon}}
140   
141    \textbf{endif}
142
143
144In the case of the new disaggregation method for precipitation, the two new sub grid points are added in the ``flux`` output files. They are identified by the forecast step parameter ``step`` which is 0 for the original time interval and 1 or 2 for the two new sub grid points respectively. The filenames do not change.   
145
146   
147.. note::
148
149    The new method for disaggregation was published in the Geoscientific Model Development Journal in 2018:
150   
151    Hittmeir, S., Philipp, A., and Seibert, P.: A conservative reconstruction scheme for the interpolation of extensive quantities in the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2503-2523, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2503-2018, 2018.
152
153     
154   
155
156 
157
158
159Disaggregation for the rest of the flux fields
160----------------------------------------------
161     
162The accumulated values for the other variables are first divided by the number of hours and
163then interpolated to the exact times X using a bicubic interpolation which conserves the integrals of the fluxes within each timespan.
164Disaggregation is done for 4 adjacent timespans (:math:`p_a, p_b, p_c, p_d`) which generates a new, disaggregated value which is output at the central point of the 4 adjacent timespans.
165
166.. math::
167   
168    p_a &= (a_3 - a_0 + 3. * (a_1 - a_2)) / 6. \\   
169    p_b &= (a_2 + a_0) / 2. - a_1 - 9. * p_a / 2. \\
170    p_c &= a_1 - a_0 - 7. * p_a / 2. - 2. * p_b \\   
171    p_d &= a_0 - p_a / 4. - p_b / 3. - p_c / 2.
172
173This new point :math:`p` is used for linear interpolation of the complete timeseries afterwards.
174
175.. math::
176   
177    p = 8. * p_a + 4. * p_b + 2. * p_c + p_d
178
179
180
181       
182       
183.. toctree::
184    :hidden:
185    :maxdepth: 2
186   
187   
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.
hosted by ZAMG